Understanding Pre-Service Vocational Teachers' Perceptions of GenAI Using ChatGPT Through the Lens of Perceived Benefit


Creative Commons License

Setiyawan A., Soeharto S., Wijaya T. T., Lavicza Z.

TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING, 2026 (ESCI, Scopus)

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Publication Date: 2026
  • Doi Number: 10.1007/s10758-026-10016-5
  • Journal Name: TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING
  • Journal Indexes: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, IBZ Online, Aerospace Database, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, Applied Science & Technology Source, Compendex, EBSCO Education Source, Education Abstracts, Educational research abstracts (ERA), ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), INSPEC, Psycinfo, Social Science Premium Collection (ProQuest), Education Collection (ProQuest), Education Source Ultimate (EBSCO), Technology Collection (ProQuest)
  • Open Archive Collection: Digital Heritage Collection
  • Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC) Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Engineering drawing is a core subject in vocational education, yet many pre-service vocational teachers face challenges integrating computer-aided design (CAD) tools and emerging technologies into instruction. Generative AI (GenAI) offers new opportunities for creating adaptive learning content and visual representations, but little is known about teachers' perceptions of its benefits in engineering drawing education. This study examined pre-service vocational teachers' perceptions of GenAI using the Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT) framework, focusing on perceived benefit of AI (BOA), knowledge of AI (KOA), value of AI (VOA), and cost of AI (COA). Data were collected from 266 pre-service vocational teachers through a validated questionnaire administered after a hybrid Vocational Teacher Development Program (VTDP) integrating CAD, 3D modeling, and ChatGPT-based instructional design tasks. Data analysis comprised four key procedures. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant demographics, while independent t-tests assessed differences in perceptions across educational backgrounds. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to establish the validity and reliability of the measurement model. Finally, structural equation modeling was employed to examine the hypothesized relationships and mediation effects among the principal constructs. Results indicated no significant differences between participants with vocational and general high-school backgrounds across all constructs. SEM revealed that BOA significantly predicted KOA, VOA, and COA, with KOA partially mediating the relationship between BOA and VOA. These findings highlight the central role of benefit perception in shaping GenAI adoption readiness. Teacher-education programs should embed benefit-driven demonstrations and AI-literacy activities to foster effective and sustainable GenAI integration in vocational training.