Akademik Məlumat İdarəetmə Sistemi
37th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development - Socio Economic Problems of Sustainable Development, Baku, Azerbaijan, 14 - 15 February 2019, pp.895-909
In this article, we systematize all the factors for the development of regional innovation systems and formulate the concept of innovative entrepreneurship. In the course of this research on issues related to an insufficient number of innovative entrepreneurs, an analysis was made of the main characteristics of programs of foreign universities that train specialists in innovative technological entrepreneurship. The results of this analysis showed that the basic principles of such programs are: Universities form an educational group of students in such a way that students of economic and natural sciences study at the same time in one group. For example, the University of Tennessee (Martin, USA) determines the contingent of students on the basis of 50:50. One of the leading programs in the field of technology entrepreneurship, the Georgia University of Technology program, forms groups in a way that each of the project teams includes at least three people: a student enrolled in the MBA program, a student in law school and a student in the natural sciences program or engineering specialties. The educational program is structured in such a way as to maximize students' practical skills in assessing market and technological prospects, skills in preparing business plans and developing the final product, and skills in conducting future business. Despite the diversity of educational programs aimed at participants of innovative business, all technological entrepreneurship programs are designed mainly for managers of innovative projects, and the objectives of this training are, as a rule, to transfer to the audience information about the rules and methods of functioning of innovative product markets necessary skills for managing innovative projects. However, it should be noted that it would be deeply mistaken to equate such participants in the innovation process as an innovation manager and an innovative entrepreneur.